Cosmic Conspiracy - Time and Space

TIME AND SPACE

One of the hottest debates in physics today is over the true nature of space: Is it a 'luminiferous ether' (see Appendix 5) or is it some abstract, ten-dimensional, Reimannian construction like Dr. Albert Einstein proposed in his Theory of General Relativity? If it does, indeed, require a superdimensioned construction to explain the physical laws of the universe, one must wonder why this construction could not be replaced by one using real and observable dimensions like width, length, and depth... If, on the other hand, space is a 'luminiferous ether' or some tenuous 'fluid', then one wonders why the functions of the physical laws of the universe cannot be observed; and, hence, translated into a mathematical construct of reality... of three real dimensions with time expressed as a ratio of relative distances and vectors.

Strange as it may seem, space has already been properly described right here on Earth as far back as 1954! Space is a 'fine structure'... a 'tenuous medium, fluid or field'. All gravitational, electromagnetic, and electrostatic phenomena occur as results of various interactions of energy 'waves' in this 'fluid space'. In pages 172-174, 176, 178 and 180 of Scientific American in 1954, a brilliant discussion giving three-dimensional explanations of many nuclear phenomena (based largely on previous discussions written by Douglass Crockwell) was conducted by Albert G. Ingalls. Crockwell's explanations offer the only real solution to the apparent paradox which certain nuclear events present to the researcher: A particle sometimes behaves like a wave. The discussion stated:

"It seems reasonable, as a first thought to accept each particle-field relationship as an inseparable something, which is perceived sometimes in one fashion and sometimes in another. We might also think of the particle portion of the effect as that which is experienced radial to the course or potential course. We know that some relationship of this sort exists, whether or not it is exactly as stated. Variation of one effect is accompanied by a reciprocal variation in the other effect. In other words, the more the particle field manifests itself as a particle, the less it manifests itself as a field, and vice versa."

"... We also know that charged particles in motion exhibit a 'sense' or quality of right - or left-handedness which characterizes their charges... From this we can infer a kind of tangential motion in space around the course of a particle - a motion which differs between particles of unlike charge."

The discussion went on to say, "...It is important to remember that the field does not rotate as a unit. The areas of the field vary only in the diameter and the phase of translation. As the field is explored from the centre outward, the phase of rotation lags progressively. Hence, its structure can be considered as a series of concentric phase shells, each 360 degrees out of step with adjoining neighbours."

"The field and particle are one, and at all points the action is similar. The diameter of translation is greatest when the particle is at relative rest. An increase of particle-field velocity is accompanied by an increased rate of rotation but a smaller radius of rotation."

The summary statements of the discussion brought out a very interesting point about James Clerk Maxwell - the Einstein of the nineteenth century:

"I submit a line from the great James Clerk Maxwell's preface to his theory of electromagnetic radiation: 'In several parts of this treatise, an attempt has been made to explain electromagnetic phenomena by means of a mechanical action...' "

A very common phenomenon illustrates Crockwell's model 'particle-field' concept. If one blows a weak 'smoke ring', it moves slowly away in a rapidly-widening ring. If, however, one blows a strong 'smoke ring', it moves away rapidly - maintaining a very small diameter. If a person nearby were struck by the latter smoke ring, the impulse or particle effect would be more obvious than the tangential expansion pressure on the ring. On the other hand, if that some person were struck by the first smoke ring of less translational energy, it would not be felt as a direct impact so much as an expanding crawl over the individual's person. Although it would prove a bit difficult in practice, one could, theoretically, shoot two smoke rings at each other so that their encounter would produce either mutual annihilation or mutual enhancement dependent upon the rotation vector applied to each ring as it left the issuing orifice. The annihilation would produce a visual effect like a 'barred-spiral galaxy' while the enhancement would produce a visual effect like the 'Sombrero galaxy'. The reader who is keenly interested in the mechanics of gravity and electromagnetism must pursue the preceding lines of thought to properly understand the 'missing link' which unites the physical laws of the microcosm with those of the macrocosm.

If one views 'space' as an infinite existence - a continuum - comprised of endless levels of subnuclear particle-fields forming atoms forming planetary systems which form galaxies that, in turn, form galactic cells and, etc. ad infinitum, then one can easily visualize that the 'ether' of man's particular level of existence is a 'fluid' comprised of ultra-small 'particle-fields' which, in turn, are made-up of relatively equally small 'particle-fields'. 'Time', as such, in a continuum of such magnitude is equally relative.

'Time' is not an absolute dimension in reality. The only absolute is energy. The distribution of energy within the various levels of the hierarchy of existence creates the phenomenon called, 'time'. As the distribution of energy is not uniform, 'time' itself, is not uniform in the universe. When a person says it took him five seconds to walk across a room, he is really saying a clock pendulum moved or changed its energy-distribution level five times as compared to his own, single change of energy-distribution made by his walk across the room. Time is a ratio of changes in energy-density. 'Time' on an atom passes much faster than 'time' at the Earth level does. If a person's body were to be 'pumped' with resonant energy, it would make him age several days in only a few relative minutes to someone watching him. If, however, the person were to be 'drained' with resonant energy, it would lower his energy-density causing him to age only a few minutes in several relative days of the observer's time. How incredible it would be... Suppose a group of scientists had to solve a very time-dependent problem in a hurry. If they were to take their pencils and paper with themselves into a 'field' which harmonically 'pumped' their energy-densities to a higher level, 'time' would extend for them. They would have several relative days to solve their problem while only a few relative minutes of time had passed to the world outside their 'field'... fascinating... isn't it?! If the American base at Pine Gap could be used to 'pump' resonant, lowfrequency energy into certain circles of the country, the effects could be mind-boggling. Why, in just a few days of time relative to the rest of the world, certain parts of Australia could pass several years of time relative to its occupants.

Has the reader ever had those days that seem to 'fly by'?... On the other hand, if the same facility could be used to 'drain' energy from those same circles of influence, the days would seem to'drag by' to those so influenced... If an electric air- or space-craft based on the same principle of resonance were to be suddenly accelerated into a new vector at speeds which would normally break its molecular lattice apart, a 'relative' or 'apparent' 35g acceleration could be easily amortized over a relative 'time-dilation' of 1:35 inside the field of the craft... giving the craft and its crew the relative acceleration of only 1g...! If the reader has been able to grasp the preceding dissertation on time and space, he now knows why 'UFOs' have such incredible performance characteristics. They are only relatively incredible...

THE 'GRAVITATIONAL' EFFECT

The reader is asked to examine figures (3-a), (3-b), and (3-c). All three figures represent the same 'system' in different energy states. The system consists of a rectangular fish-tank - sealed on all sides. The pump (c) pumps water into the tank through hole (a) and extracts the water from hole (b). A small trolley car (d) with one, upright end resides on the track (f). Assuming that no air bubbles appear in the circulation patterns, when the pump is activated, the trolley car will move away from the water inlet (a) toward the end (e) with no visible means of acceleration to an observer outside the tank. The trolley car will come to rest flat against the end as shown in figure (3-b).

Now, let the same process be repeated with several holes having been drilled through the trolley car's upright as shown in figure (3-c). The trolley car will not come to rest flat against the end (e). Instead, it will stand back from the end a certain distance. To the observer, the trolley car would have oscillated toward the end (e) very briefly before coming to rest in the position shown. The reason is plain: The water from the inlet struck the upright driving it toward (e); however, some of the water passed through the holes in the upright striking (e) and rebounding back into the upright as it approached (e) creating an 'energy-cushion' between the end and the upright. So, as long as the observer could not see or feel the energy 'waves' moving the trolley car he could only deduce some 'force' was at work which had either 'pushed' or 'pulled' the trolley car to the end.

If the observer could then somehow place his hand into the tank while the system was operating, without destroying the pressure seal, he could take the upright in his fingers and move it toward the end (e). Upon releasing the trolley car, he would see it move away from the end (e) returning to its former position - however, this time the observer would have 'felt' the force that tugged at the trolley car. Yet, that 'force' was actually the resultant of one force acting upon its own partial reflection from the end (e).

If the observer could then move the trolley car toward the end of the water inlet (a), he would find that the 'tugging' force had apparently reversed direction as it would then be pulling toward the end (e). He would then realize that releasing the trolley car would allow it to 'gravitate' to the point along the track (f) where the force of the incoming water was being balanced by the force of the reflected water.

In reality, all mass on the surface or outer shell of the Earth is matter whose nuclear density (like the holes in the upright) has caused it to 'gravitate' to that distance or radius which is the resultant of an energy-input-vase passing through its nuclear holes, meeting itself in the centre of Earth, and reflecting back toward itself.

The centre of the Earth is like the end (e) while that spot where the trolley cat 'gravitates - to' is like the surface of Earth.

Certain conclusions follow from these observations. Firstly, 'gravity' is the resultant of a bidirectional pair of forces. Secondly, 'gravity' has higher oscillation frequencies the closer the observer approaches to the centre of the input-energy wave reflection point. Thirdly, a mass whose nuclear 'hole-spacing' gives it a greater 'particle-field' density than another with more 'holes' per unit area will not reside at the same radius from the 'centre' as the other will. It will, in fact, reside closer to the centre. This effect can be detected on the Earth's surface, by a study of the, so-called, 'specific gravitational nature' of the elements - which will show that 'gravity' and 'specific gravity' are the same phenomenon.

It is quite simple. Even though acceleration due to gravity is basically a constant on Earth, when a mass takes on a 'gravitational' radius from the centre of the Earth it is related to the ratio of its atomic 'particle-field' areas divided into the atomic spacing areas (or 'holes'). Therefore, those masses of the higher ratios of 'particle-field' densities to atomic 'holes' reside closer to the centre; and are referred to as more dense objects. That mass whose ratio approaches infinity converts to pure, radiant energy from the centre of the system.

The 'gravitational' effect is, in reality, the resultant of more than just two opposing forces. As any object must have spin around its own axis to have the effect, it follows that the 'gravitational' effect is the resultant of the spin/anti-spin moments and the convergent/divergent moments... This is the reason that 'gravitational' fields vary by the fourth power of their angular velocity in free space. Such a theory of 'gravity' also predicts that 'gravitational' shells exist in any 'gravitational' field. These shells would give the illusion that 'gravity' reversed its direction as one approached the centre of the generating field. In this theory, if one were to drill a hole to the centre of the Earth, and were to drop a stone down that hole, one could expect the stone to fall only a portion of the distance to the centre before reversing direction and 'falling' back up the hole until it found its shell of balanced forces. Recent tests have even visually shown the Sun has at least one such inner shell which can be 'seen' through the sunspots. This inner shell spins so fast, that for the first time it appears that the hyperbolic equation which Laplace once formulated for orbital radius versus relative velocity is totally acceptable!

THE 'MAGNETIC' EFFECT

'Magnetism' is the same type of phenomenon as 'gravity'. All things in normal states can be 'magnetised' to some degree. 'Gravity', also, normally affects all things in its field. 'Gravity' has frequency and so does 'magnetism'. 'Gravity' has 'shells' of balanced forces and so does 'magnetism'. Where is the difference? It is quite simple. If a mass (like the Earth) spins around its own axis, the resulting reductions of pressure in the 'fluid of space' (see Appendix 5) produce 'gravity'. As the sub-particles of this mass (like electrons) orbit a chain of atoms in spiralling courses - thus reducing the pressure at right angles to the particle path in the 'fluid of space' - an interlocking series of vectors give the illusion of 'magnetism'. The motion of Earth around the Sun could be called a 'magnetic' moment while its motion around its own axis is a 'gravitic' moment.

The frequency of a nuclear magnetic field is very high when compared to the frequency of the gravitic field that contains the Earth. 'Gravity' is a source of power and so is 'magnetism'. Both are results of balanced-but dynamic forces. By introducing shielding or a method of diverting the energy density of one 'shell' to a lower state 'shell' one can draw energy from both fields. There is more - much more to say - but it might prove too technical for this book.

In a forthcoming publication, the author will thoroughly explain 'gravity' and 'magnetism' as functions of inertial waves in the 'ether' or 'the fine structure' of 'space'. The mystery of the so called 'North' and 'South' poles of magnets will be visually explained as will be the 'right-hand' twist of magnetic fields. A method of utilizing 'gravity' as a means of transport will also be detailed by a discussion of the use of resonating, low-frequency, high-voltage electric fields. But, these things must wait for the present moment...

 by Stan Deyo

from The Cosmic Conspiracy

There's plenty more - see http://au.geocities.com/psyberplasmic/ccS1-3.html

Einstein playing violin - http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~spac205/einst_9.jpeg 

tags: ram  ayana  new  illuminati  stan  deyo  time  and  space  gravity  antigravity  anti  magnetism  crockwell  einstein  electromagnetic  propulsion  

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit