| Melded Multiple Infinities |
|
|
|
| Written by Abdun Nur
|
| In our physical universe some conceive distance and the space it spans to be infinite, and some conceive time to be infinite; this is the concept of unlimitedness. In effect this means that the idea of infinity is simply always larger than any imposed value or boundary - a view of something boundless. You will always have higher levels of infinity without end, because there is in fact only one infinity - the infinite aspect of Allah (Not God), (which is AHAD, SAMAD AND LAM YULAD). AHAD: Means ALLAH is the infinite and limitless (eternal) ONE who is unbroken and undivided into fragments or particles. SAMED: Means that which has no gap, which is in perfect condition, is whole without holes and is impermeable; that which admits nothing in, nothing out. It means "solid" - infinitely solid - so far beyond solid as to be free from the conception of need. LAMYALID or LAM YULAD: Means simply, "ALLAH DID NOT BEGET. ALLAH WAS NOT BEGOTTEN." – so there are no baby Allahs. The reason no-one can conceive of the functioning structure of multiple infinities (as the single infinity is ordered) is because of the limitations of mathematical reasoning, and the limitation of the abstract and intangible representations of mathematics to describe manifest reality. As Godel pointed out in his “Incompleteness Theorem”, any system based on mathematical reasoning cannot fully explain itself without reference to a higher order system (One emanating power, Allah {Not God}). Turing followed this up with the fact that you cannot even apply computational algorithms to the problem. He showed that there are computational algorithms the outcome of which cannot ever be determined. All you can do is set them in motion and watch and wait (in time) for complexity to emerge. In my opinion (for what its worth) Cantor, Godel and Turing are three of the most important figures in mathematics, but because their ideas threatened the foundations of most of modern mathematical and scientific reasoning they have been sidelined by the establishment – as always happens. To grasp the scale of just the infinite universe we reside in is not yet possible with any accuracy and never will be, as you cannot impose a limiting mathematical boundary on something that is truly infinite. Cosmology is in a state of constant discovery of ever greater proportions, so imposed boundaries are in a constant state of expansion; the more we learn the greater the infinity. The concept of the growth of a seed is a mechanism of a more organic nature - the birth of a seed, and its energetic exchanges with the manifold, building out to form each galaxy like the transformation of an apple blossom into a shining red apple over vast expanses of time. The first galaxy’s age is impossible to estimate from our present scientific abilities. To me it seems reasonable to consider the nature of reality to follow the existing organic model; this model repeats throughout creation. Growth of an organic or inorganic nature demonstrates transformation. It is conceivable that new galaxies are in a state of constant construction, filling the blackness with a magical magnificence (See the essay: ‘The formation of a galaxy, evolving a universe’). So if you consider this structure of galaxy generation you may well ask, ‘what is the inauguration of a galaxy? And it seems simple when you consider all reality is a form of energy (information), and all energy is inter-exchangeable, and the construal of all energies is conscious knowledge. The seed of galaxy formation is a thought. Sounds impossible - but consider Allah (Not God) as the pure dichotomy of creation, the dichotomy of pure nothingness held under tension by the totality of everything. And Allah grew from pure nothingness, building knowledge upon itself until all realities and lesser unremitting dichotomies pour from this pure single dichotomy. Consider; this overarching dichotomy is the only valid dichotomy. It cannot have any other instance; if you take the dichotomy of pure blackness and blinding light, all the colours of the rainbow exist between this dichotomy. Examples of this dichotomy fill this reality. It abounds, as conditions allow this situation of pure blackness and blinding light to abound. However, only one pure nothingness can exist. No conceivable condition could be created that would change this reality. It is absolutely impossible for two pure nothingnesses to exist, as to have two would demand something to separate them. Equally it would be absolutely impossible to have two everythings, as by definition everything is all that can be. This means only one pure nothingness held in tension to the totality of everything could ever exist, and what is manifest between the tension of this overarching dichotomy? Allah (Not God) - as with all dichotomies what is created from the tension of opposites is the real phenomenon. This is why Allah is the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the single consciousness. Every particle of knowledge in existence is emanated from the inside out through this overarching dichotomy. It makes clear why Allah (Not God) could never be a man; a man is just a man. We cannot be the single supreme consciousness, for we are but a light bulb fed by the power of the single universal power generator. But I digress.
Caesium-133 atomically resonates between two energy states at exactly 9,192,631,770 times a second. If you consider this against the speed of light within the vacuum, which travels at 186,283 miles per second, then at each clock cycle of caesium light travels 326mm. But the atomic caesium clock is not the fastest resonating benchmark of time. The atomic resonance of strontium is 429,228,004,229,952 cycles per second, emitting microwaves of exactly that frequency, so light travels only 0.00006984479mm (69.84479 nanometres) per cycle. Even faster resonating mass may exist of course; this demonstrates the observable boundary of physically manifest regeneration. But how can we recognize this, you may say?
We can only observe the underlying or overarching structural framework of our physical universe to attempt to understand the underlying masterpiece of creation. One structure that is a designate of the system is differential fractals. We can consider this structure in relation to infinity, organised upon a differential fractal system which manifests as each apparent infinity being held as a single drop within the next, nesting just as a crystal builds outward as a growing copy, a fractal growth; the lesser integral within the greater. Yet more exists beyond these fundamental infinities of eleven dimensional space - so infinite it holds all this within it as insignificant; so subtle it is hidden yet all pervasive. We have no understanding of what lies beyond this - a reality of infinities generated through the will of a single consciousness, all reality growing out from a single point of infinite non-existence, all knowledge retained. And this knowledge expands. Knowledge builds knowledge and spins out from non-existence. Conscious knowledge fills non-existence and a universe of immense and boundless magnificence builds, evolving into a reality we ponder in a mind composed of tiny thoughts; a mind infused with a tiny spark of conscious existence loaned to us from the single conscious will. Consciousness is the highest stage in the creative and manifest process of existence (from the manifold, to tangible energetic information, to interaction and evolution of conscious expansion), which is the force which feeds back into the manifold in a positive way and in an incrementally recursive manner, through higher and higher levels of reason - (Qur’an) understanding and wisdom, in order for us to ultimately find our way back to the source of all creation, which is Allah. So to conclude, only one true infinity exists; this without doubt emanates all realities, in every single aspect, and in every thought of imaginative consciousness. This single underlying infinity is Allah (Not God). When considered from the perspective of a single consciousness powered from the infinite power of the overarching paradox within the founding dichotomy it is apparent no God exists, but something transfinite exists; a fundamental source of every instant, of every reality, deeper, richer, far more profound than any concept of God could ever hope to be. There is of course another way to approach infinity, and that is as an expression of dimension; you can apply a measure of length to it, as we do with time, height, width and length, so you could conceive of the underlying manifold as the 5th dimension. But it is a dimensional plane so alien to our conscious ability to ascribe any conceptual manifestation of its reality that infinity seems more conservative a description. We reside in all eleven dimensional planes simultaneously. We exist as the physical expression of the conscious will and imagination of Allah (Not God), as all things must.
Glossary Melded - things which are combined or blended to become one thing or substance. Fractals - repeating geometric patterns: irregular or fragmented geometric shapes that can be repeatedly subdivided into parts, each of which is a smaller differential copy of the whole. Fractals are used in computer modelling of natural structures that do not have simple geometric shapes, such as clouds, mountainous landscapes and coastlines. Natural fractals are never exact copies but similar copies. Differential - mathematical change in variable: an infinitesimal change: able or liable to change, especially suddenly and unpredictably Potential - possible but as yet not actual: having a latent possibility or likelihood of occurring, or of doing or becoming something.
|
From Servant of the Light
see also Transfinite Consciousness
and
(all by Abdun Nur)
Images - http://www.miqel.com/images_1/fractal_math_patterns/wada-reflection-basin/wada-basin-fractals020.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3110/3507399136_eabe243b00.jpg
http://astroweb1.physics.ox.ac.uk/~philcosmo2009/images/multiverse7.jpg
http://www.abstractdigitalartgallery.com/grinagog-abstract-digital-art-fractal-mapping-the-multiverse-web.jpg
For further enlightenment see –
The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com
(These sites have been locked by Today.com and this author no longer has access to his own blogs - Enlightenment Today
Imagine Nation – Artwork & Images )
This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…
From the New Illuminati – http://newilluminati.blog-city.com
I love the way this has been expressed. The only dif for me is, that is
pretty much my outpicturing of what God is. The same One energy behind
everything - one and all dimensional. I don't think it matters what you
call It, once you understand our relationship as well as our complete
inability to comprehend infinity with a finite brain. [of course we have
other ways of comprehending existence) Still, we are made of It, and
everything that is and isn't is made of It. We live and move and have our
being in this consciousness. Things are thick thought...etc. I do think
the Christian Bible does confuse people with two stories side by side and
intertwined: that of our One Infinite Creative Source (i.e. "In the
beginning was the Word and the Word was God ... and from It were all things
made" - word - logos - primoridal vibration. And it also contains
humanities great shock at the 'gods' that came from the "skies' (ETs?) and
controlled with religious fear mongering. So, in that way, if one thinks
of 'god' as finite, perhaps as an old man folding white sheets in the sky,
as my young daughter once imagined, then I agree...I would not call it god.
But if Allah is described in this way, I do not see how that differs from
metaphysical understanding of God.
I love the way this has been expressed. The only dif for me is, that is
pretty much my outpicturing of what God is. The same One energy behind
everything - one and all dimensional. I don't think it matters what you
call It, once you understand our relationship as well as our complete
inability to comprehend infinity with a finite brain. [of course we have
other ways of comprehending existence) Still, we are made of It, and
everything that is and isn't is made of It. We live and move and have our
being in this consciousness. Things are thick thought...etc. I do think
the Christian Bible does confuse people with two stories side by side and
intertwined: that of our One Infinite Creative Source (i.e. "In the
beginning was the Word and the Word was God ... and from It were all things
made" - word - logos - primoridal vibration. And it also contains
humanities great shock at the 'gods' that came from the "skies' (ETs?) and
controlled with religious fear mongering. So, in that way, if one thinks
of 'god' as finite, perhaps as an old man folding white sheets in the sky,
as my young daughter once imagined, then I agree...I would not call it god.
But if Allah is described in this way, I do not see how that differs from
metaphysical understanding of God